Open Evaluation: A Vision for Entirely Transparent Post-Publication Peer Review and Rating for Science
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Open Evaluation: A Vision for Entirely Transparent Post-Publication Peer Review and Rating for Science
The two major functions of a scientific publishing system are to provide access to and evaluation of scientific papers. While open access (OA) is becoming a reality, open evaluation (OE), the other side of the coin, has received less attention. Evaluation steers the attention of the scientific community and thus the very course of science. It also influences the use of scientific findings in pu...
متن کاملDebunking Post-Publication Peer Review
Science forms a fundamental core of many aspects of society. Many objects, functionalities, systems and processes are based on scientific principles and fundamentals. The latter two are often derived from scientific discovery which is traditionally built upon appropriate hypothesis testing, and exposed through published reports, in the form of scientific papers. Thus, any object or process that...
متن کاملTrueReview: A Platform for Post-Publication Peer Review
In post-publication peer review, scientific contributions are first published in open-access forums, such as arXiv or other digital libraries, and are subsequently reviewed and possibly ranked and/or evaluated. Compared to the classical process of scientific publishing, in which review precedes publication, post-publication peer review leads to faster dissemination of ideas, and publicly-availa...
متن کاملTrueReview: A Proposal for Post-Publication Peer Review WHITE PAPER
In post-publication peer review, scientific contributions are first published in open-access forums, such as arXiv or other digital libraries, and are subsequently reviewed and possibly ranked and/or evaluated. Compared to the classical process of scientific publishing, in which review precedes publication, post-publication peer review leads to faster dissemination of ideas, and publicly-availa...
متن کاملThe need for post-publication peer review in plant science publishing
The discussion among scientists about the quality of a published paper should be a constant, dynamic process, even beyond the act of publication. A published paper should not be the final step in the halflife of a scientific manuscript and critical analysis, post-publication, through postpublication peer review (PPPR), should be part of a new and dynamic process that should be embraced by scien...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
سال: 2012
ISSN: 1662-5188
DOI: 10.3389/fncom.2012.00079